From the record
FOC recommends parents go to Court before filing professional complaint.
The recommendation in this Friend of the Court (FOC) report that parents route grievances through the family court before filing a professional licensing complaint raises significant legal, procedural, and ethical concerns.
The recommendation in this Friend of the Court (FOC) report that parents route grievances through the family court before filing a professional licensing complaint raises significant legal, procedural, and ethical concerns:
- Jurisdictional Overreach: FOC staff and family court judges lack statutory authority over state professional licensing boards. State regulatory boards (e.g., medical, psychology, or social work boards) typicall possess exclusive jurisdiction to investigate standards of care, ethical violations, and professional misconduct. A court officer should not preempt or restrict a citizen's administrative rights to report potential regulatory violations.
- First Amendment & Right to Petition Concerns: Advising a party to route complaints through the court first creates a chilling effect on a citizen's First Amendment right to petition government regulatory bodies for grievances. Suppressing or delaying administrative reports interferes with public safety mechanisms designed to hold licensed professionals accountable.
- Conflating Legal Standards with Professional Ethics: The report states that the FOC does not treat a licensing complaint as "proof of misconduct" or unsuitability. While an active complaint is not definitive proof, diverting ethical concerns to a family court judge—who evaluates the child's best interest rather than professional license standards—muddies the evidentiary threshold and places an improper burden on the court
- Conflict of Interest & Due Process: Encouraging litigants to clear complaints with the court first can inadvertently shield court-appointed or involved professionals from regulatory scrutiny. Litigants are entitled to seek administrative relief independently without fear that doing so will be framed by the FOC or court as uncooperative or adverse to their custody position. While family courts manage evidentiary admissibility and provider appointments within litigation, they cannot condition, delay, or restrict a parent's right to file formal administrative complaints with a state licensing board.
The record
Every judge has a record. Find yours.
More from the record
All posts- BlogJudge Lauren Adams Ogden Suspended: Eight Cases, One PatternThe Judicial Conduct Commission suspended Jefferson Family Court Judge Lauren Adams Ogden for 30 days without pay. The order rests on eight family-court cases. Here is each one.
- BlogLouisville Family Court Judge Suspended 30 days WITHOUT pay! Following numerous complaints and a comprehensive review of records, the Commission found that Judge Ogden violated multiple provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct and engaged in misconduct in office.
- BlogJCC Budget Fiscal Year 2026Kentucky's sole judicial watchdog won't specify who gets $100K in taxpayer-funded legal fees.