emergency custody hearing Legal Knowledge: did not care about facts or evidence. presented an emergency custody hearing due to a spiral feature of the tibia of a 1.5 year old. 8 doctors said it was abuse. she said no evidence and back to 50/50 custody with the abuser. he is still abusing the child. Fairness & Impartiality: paid off by certain attorneys Judicial Temperament: she looked bored and not even paying attention Communication: very short with her ruling as if she had coffee to get back to that was more important than child abuse Timeliness: she was on time. made her decision based on bribery instead of facts