At the conclusion of a custody and visitation trial, Judge Fisher allowed the defendant's attorney to amend his final order in a private meeting with the Judge, without the plaintiff present. The amemdment was in the form of a pen and ink change, initialed by the attorney after the judge had signed the document. The amendment asssigned thousands of dollars in therapy costs to the then unemployed plaintiff. Fairness & Impartiality: Judge Fisher showed significant deference to the defendan'ts counsel, allowing the defendant's counsel to draft the final order, and then amend the final order without the plaintiff (pro se) present. Judicial Temperament: Judge Fisher laughed out loud when the plaintiff claimed he was unable to pay his attorney an additional $30,000 advance over and above the retainer his attorney had alreader received. Judge Fisher stated "divorces are expensive" and allowed the plaintiff's attorney to withdraw from the case 10 days before trial, leaving the plaintiff without counsel during the trial. Communication: Judge Fisher ordered very restrictive custody and visitation for the plaintiff, without justification or explanation. For example each of three children were assigned different rule sets, and all visitation was to be accomplished during the standard 9:00am to 5:00 pm workday.