Judge Pavlack’s record in my case is a study in judicial contradiction. In December 2022, she ruled that allegations against me were false and awarded me primary custody. Just six months later, she ignored her own findings and stripped me of my children for 'no reason' other than the chaos of an unrelated case in another county. By allowing a PFA to bypass a formal custody hearing, she facilitated a 700+ day separation that began with a fit mother and ended with a destroyed family unit. She proved that even a 'fair' ruling is meaningless if the judge is willing to flip the script the moment the system asks them to. Legal Knowledge: Judge Pavlack demonstrated a selective understanding of the 14th Amendment and the fundamental right to parent. In December 2022, she properly applied the principle of 'Presumption of Fitness' by awarding me primary custody and dismissing false allegations. However, by June 2023, she abandoned these core legal principles. She allowed a Protection From Abuse (PFA) order to bypass the 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' standard required to strip a fit parent of custody. Her understanding of the law appears to be secondary to her desire to align with the removal narratives of neighboring counties. Fairness & Impartiality: Extreme inconsistency. In December 2022, Judge Pavlack correctly ruled that allegations against me were unfounded and granted me primary custody. However, by June 2023, she allowed that same custody to be stripped away via a PFA—giving children to the very person (Christian Blomquist) she had previously found made false claims. A judge who validates a parent as 'fit' and then allows 'guilt by association' from a separate county to override her own findings is not fair; she is a follower of the system, not the law Judicial Temperament: Professional in demeanor, but dismissive in practice. While she maintains the outward appearance of a composed judge, her actions show a disregard for the long-term trauma caused by her contradictory rulings. A 'polite' judge who participates in the unnecessary destruction of a family unit is still participating in an injustice Communication: Total failure in judicial transparency. There was no clear communication as to how a mother who was 'fit' in December became 'unfit' in June without a single new incident involving these specific children. The court essentially went silent, allowing a temporary order to become a permanent separation that has now lasted over 723 days. When a judge flips her own script, the least she owes a family is a clear, evidence-based explanation. I received none Timeliness: Selective urgency. The court was incredibly fast to take my children in June 2023, but has been glacially slow to revisit that decision. By allowing 'temporary' emergency orders to linger for nearly two years without a meaningful return to the December 2022 status quo, the court has facilitated 'status quo' bonding with the other parent at the expense of the children's right to their mother. Justice delayed is justice denied