Family court proceedings Legal Knowledge: There was no NCGS relevant for my case that were followed . The judge admitted on the record of violations of UCCJEA . Relates violations of UCCJEA and PKPA. The judge have been perpetually violating constitutional rights including but not limited to 14th Amendment and 1st Amendment. They also perpetually violated rights under ADA. Fairness & Impartiality: Brought Office into disrepute by instructing staff to conceal Connecticut Case, removed attached to the attorney’s complaint CT Pendente lite Agreement facilitating contempt evasion due to 11 months no contact with the child as per attorney’s complaint. Instructed the staff to routinely support the required narrative on the docket by deleting motions with critical evidence, removing evidence of filed and served witnesses subpoenas, deleting orders with GKO threats, deleting initial ex parte orders, deleting temporary order and substituting it with a non existing consent order after the child was removed permanently across the state lines without legal warrant. Issued final judgment relying on the refuted evidence in the motions which were deleted if the docket . The judge violated multiple Cannons including but not limited to Cannon 3 Appearnce of Impropriety. Judicial Temperament: The judge entered premature ex parte orders with the narrative opposite to the opposing attorney’s complaint in absence of subject matter jurisdiction concealing contempt and established jurisdiction of a court with established jurisdiction in accordance with UCCJEA.The judge facilitating contempt evasion by removing violated temporary Pendente lite agreement court ordered creating legal chaos in North Carolina during ongoing litigation in Connecticut. The ex parte orders backed up the invalid complaint and served there with the summons denying 30 days to respond. When moved to speak to the Connecticut judge , Judge Scott admitted on the record that he could not exercise jurisdiction in any way shape or form coercing CT Plaintiff to NC jurisdiction under threats of contempt and sanctions embedded in the orders. The NC judge asserted to the CT judge that he would issue no order unless CT court declined to exercise jurisdiction despite the orders were served 70 days prior hearing scheduled sanctioning attorneys fees in breach of CT stay. This followed by deletion of the orders from the court record or these orders were not meant for filing on the docket and were discards after serving its coercive purpose . The false therapist report with made up child diagnosis filed with the CT court, as later transpired, was used to influence CT judge to decline court initial custody jurisdiction. Morion was denied in the order using legal language to limit future filings instead of conducting mandatory inquiry. The jurisdictional findings were never made . Judge Scott coerced to unknown unserved consent post ADA advocate notice and post removal of child on a temporary order without notice , motion or legal warrant existing . The final judgment was issued with the child missing from the state de facto but de jure present. Retaliatory GKO was issued to deny any access to court, refusing to file notice of appeal. The previously filed notice was removed because of multiple records deletions and substitutions, court refusal to make exceptions for multiple child emergency motions and for ADA motions requesting accommodations. The court staff knowingly denied to correct the distorted records rendering appeal meaningless. Communication: The judge violated statutes of the Honest Duty service as continuously misled with interpretation of the law . Timeliness: The judge acted in absence of subject matter and personal jurisdiction for 24 months due to lack of proper service and attorney’s inability to sustain the claim.