Hon. Shelley M. Santry

custody case. school options. Legal Knowledge: stated multiple times that she did not review the file Fairness & Impartiality: assumed I was in a “gang” Judicial Temperament: threaten to put me in jail for disagreeing to a lie by other party, whom she allowed to speak freely with no facts Communication: doesn’t listen to full story nor gives any vital suggestions Timeliness: oh she will rush you out that court room so I’m going to say poor because nothing gets done

Family court school decision Legal Knowledge: Was rude and condescending. Tried to be fair to dad (which is fine) but the reason she gave for ruling in his favor was “it’s what dad wants”.

Legal Knowledge: Struggles with complex issues. Fairness & Impartiality: She tries kiss up to the attorneys and is different to pro se litigants Judicial Temperament: She doesn’t yell so better than most Communication: Orders confusing - she over explains and avoids being clear