General Magistrate Gina Mendez Locke was appointed by Judge Samantha Ruiz Cohen between October 2022 and 2025. The case was Shakia Floyd v. Sobers Brooks and this was a child support which was heard in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida. My first appearance was before the magistrate on May 4, 2023 in a Zoom hearing. Legal Knowledge: I had rejected the magistrate because the was attempting to enforce a child support order which would have been nullified if the laws were followed. Nonetheless, the went ahead with the hearing even though I presented an email evidence where my former attorney Renita Henry had admitted to omitting three pertinent information (state tax, city tax, and mandatory retirement salary deductions). In one email my former attorney clearly stated that the calculation was a deviation from guidelines (Florida Statute 61.30). However, at the hearing the general magistrate totally disregarded the evidence and focused more on enforcement. She would eventually add $3000 purge to the child support arrears and included in her recommendation for a Writ of Bodily Attachment if I failed to pay the purge payment within a week. The rules that she was applying was not consistent with the constitution. At another hearing the magistrate would find me in contempt of court. Fairness & Impartiality: It felt more like I was at an hearing and there was no mediator, just me and everyone including the magistrate was the opposition. Florida Statutes 61.30 and 839.13 was violated, fraud on the court violation (Rule 60(d)(3), color of law, civil rights, just to name a few. Judicial Temperament: General Magistrate Gina Mendez Locke demeanor was more like that of an opposition that someone who was there for equitable result. Communication: The case that were used did not demonstrate that omissions were legal. I do not believe that the magistrate cared much about explaining anything to me. It was as if this was best practice and no one would criminalize her actions, and that’s exactly what happened.