Justice is blind.We're not.

Every judge has a record. Find yours.

18,693 judicial officers · 50 states · No account required

Exhibit A · Updated Oct 28, 2026

Developing story

Judge Lauren Adams Ogden suspended 30 days without pay

The Judicial Conduct Commission suspended Jefferson Family Court Judge Lauren Adams Ogden for 30 days without pay, citing eight family-court cases. Two days after the announcement, a writ of prohibition was filed against her. Our coverage, case by case.

All coverage (11) →Ratings for Hon. Lauren Adams Ogden →

Latest

The record is what the court says.This is what everybody else says.

Litigant

Redacted — click to reveal the record for Trial court, Jefferson County, KY

Trial court · Jefferson County, KY

Laziest judge ever. No control over his schedule. Blatant disrespect toward him by third parties. Legal Knowledge: Doesn't understand basic due process and rules of Motion Hour Fairness & Impartiality: Only after you are in front of him 6 to 9 months Communication: Copy and pasted things that didn't make sense for why he would not find other party in contempt. "Clear and Convincing... Blah. Blah."

Apr 20263 found helpful

Litigant

Redacted — click to reveal the record for Superior Court, Jackson County, GA

Superior Court · Jackson County, GA

TPO hearing Legal Knowledge: My ex tried to do divorce through TPO. while we waited the judge called out another case for the same thing. When it was my turn she was not consistent. Fairness & Impartiality: First month on the job and she worked in the prosecution’s office previously. My ex admitted on the stand that she hit me first and she had hit me in the past and that that would be considered domestic violence. The judge was clearly female biased. Judicial Temperament: she was fine Communication: She talked from both sides of her mouth.

May 2026

Litigant

Redacted — click to reveal the record for Trial court, Bullitt County, KY

Trial court · Bullitt County, KY

Divorce and child abuse Fairness & Impartiality: 0 rating. She is out of control on the bench. No fairness, an attitude where she’s then one who makes the decisions. Timeliness: Daughters divorce was drawn out 24 month exactly. Why? Prob money! Communication: Poor communication. She will ask the attorneys and CPS their findings and opinions, then totally goes against both the child’s attorney and CPS recommendations. Monica Neredith needs to step down. She is inappropriate for a Family Court Judge.

May 202612 found helpful

Litigant

Redacted — click to reveal the record for Trial court, Jefferson County, KY

Trial court · Jefferson County, KY

I haven't met an attorney that isn't astounded by this case. No one has seen anything like it. To say she has favorites, and leans into the dysfunction of the other party instead of addressing it. Doesn't enforce orders. Takes allegations and character assasination as evidence, and gives no weight to the mounds of evidence that I have. Favors certain attorneys and FOC's. Absolute nightmare.

Mar 202612 found helpful

Litigant

Redacted — click to reveal the record for Circuit Court, Jefferson County, KY

Circuit Court · Jefferson County, KY

Judge Haner is punctual, professional & runs a tight courtroom ship in regards to all parties involved. Doesn’t allow for any kind of drama from either side and is quick and effective. Nothing but respect for this Judge.

Mar 20263 found helpful

The App

Justice in the palm of your hand.

Find a judge, rate one, or see what your county is saying.

Read what other people who stood in that courtroom said.

Ratings across fairness, timeliness, legal knowledge, temperament and communication.

The Judge-y app, searching judges by name, court, or county.

The JudgeMental Podcast

Every week we read the decisions out loud.Somebody has to.

browse the archive →

EP 110EP 110 That's All, Folks!JudgeMental Podcast – Episode 110: "That's All, Folks!" Episode 110 marks a milestone and a momentary goodbye. The hosts raise a Miller High Life to celebrate reaching 110 episodes — now downloaded in 69 countries in less than one year — before announcing they're stepping back from the podcast to focus on building out their core platform. What's Discussed in This Episode: The Hiatus Announcement Christine and co-hosts explain why they're taking a break: the emotional and logistical toll of the podcast has become unsustainable. Christine opens up about retaliation she's faced, the weight of holding others' trauma without compensation, and the need to reset. The team emphasizes that no content is being removed — the mission is simply shifting focus toward developing the Judge-y app, the website, and the judicial accountability community they've built. "We built what could be a huge movement, and will be. But we don't owe our day-to-day, not sleeping at night." The Bridgeman Case The hosts note that nothing was filed by the GAL in the public record, but that an order has come down and a case management conference is upcoming. Christine raises concerns about matters potentially being handled off the public record via what she describes as a "shadow docket," and calls for transparency. She says the case "gives her the heebie-jeebies," noting the involvement of a high-profile family and the presence of an unidentified individual at a confidential hearing. The Matt Bevin Case A bench warrant was issued after former Governor Matt Bevin appeared remotely at a sentencing hearing despite three explicit notices requiring his in-person attendance. The hosts debate whether the judge's handling — issuing a bench warrant that was recalled upon payment of a $250 fine — was proper enforcement or political theater. Christine argues it was the latter, given that Bevin almost certainly knew he'd just pay the fine. Co-host Trey pushes back, noting the judge was consistent in requiring in-person attendance and was building a proper record for escalating consequences. Attorney Accountability & Complacency A broader conversation emerges about the "pussification of Louisville lawyers" — attorneys who privately complain about judicial misconduct and incompetence but won't file motions, preserve the record, or stand up for their clients. The hosts argue that attorney complacency is one of the biggest systemic problems in family court, noting that attorneys who "play the game" get more court appointments while clients suffer. Prosecutors & The Judicial System The team discusses how prosecutors routinely fail domestic violence victims — including cases where a person admitted on recording to drugging and raping their spouse and still received minimal consequences. Christine argues the problem isn't about gender or race but about unchecked power: "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Judge Lauren Ogden & The Social Dynamics of the Bench A candid moment: Christine shares that the only two family court judges she'd "have a beer with" are Angela Johnson and Lori Goodwin. She expresses concern that Judge Johnson may be getting herself into a situation that "could be one to break," while also noting the troubling dynamic of attorneys who trash judges in private but pose for photos with them publicly. Stay Connected & Support the Movement: 📲 Download the Judge-y app and join the community: judge-y.com 🐦 Follow us on social: @Judgingthejudges 💬 Share your story — all submissions are confidential 🛒 Buy merch to support the show 💰 Community membership is $10/month — if you genuinely can't afford it, email Christine directly to discuss a waiver 🎙️ Share old episodes with friends, legislators, and anyone who cares about judicial accountability All episodes remain available. The team will make announcements about future plans on their website and social channels. LEGAL DISCLAIMER The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Engaging with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the hosts, guests, or their firms. The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are solely those of the individuals involved and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any law firm, company, or organization. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the information presented. Any reliance on the information in this podcast is at your own risk. Laws are constantly changing, and every situation is unique. You should always seek the advice of a qualified attorney for your specific legal concerns.

The Founders

Who's behind this.

At the end of the day, it’s about the kids who are stuck in the middle of a system that moves too slow.

The sharp, seasoned co-host of The JudgeMental Podcast and developer behind Judge-y. Bringing decades of courtroom experience, he strips away legal jargon to demand transparency and pull the curtain back on bench politics.

Trey BarrowCo-founder

Watch Trey’s why2:17

If you’re a judge and you’re afraid of a rating app, ask yourself what you’re doing that you don’t want people to see.

The unapologetic creator of Judge-y. From Kentucky roots to social commentary, she’s calling for judicial accountability. Bold, witty, and always real.

Christine MillerCo-founder

Watch Christine’s why2:57

Illustrated portrait of Christine Miller

The File Room

One click in, it's all business.

Court decisions as readable pages — full text, original commentary, the PDF underneath. No paywall, no login, no jokes past this point.

Browse all cases →Read the blog →

Rate yours.

Rate your judge, follow your county, know before you go.